Pre-Action Clinical Liability Investigation
PACLI is a propriety TMLEP service which provides in depth multi-disciplinary expertise. It is designed for matters where you want to avoid the complexity, delay, and risk associated with managing multiple expert instructions at investigation stage.
Under PACLI, TMLEP takes responsibility for the entire expert instruction process.
This includes:
- Identifying the appropriate clinical disciplines
- Instructing suitable experts for breach and causation
- Managing timelines, clarifications, and coordination
- Integrating expert input into a single, coherent evidential output so you can see clearly the strength and weaknesses of the case.
PACLI removes the administrative and strategic burden of managing multiple experts, while reducing the risk of fragmented or incomplete evidence.
The service provides early clarity on clinical liability and, where required, delivers court-compliant, individual disclosable expert evidence reports to support any views from a PACLI report.
PACLI is particularly suited to matters where certainty is needed to decide whether a claim should proceed, resolve, or be discontinued.
Client Testimonials
The depth of your expert panel, combined with the consistently high quality of reporting, makes you a trusted resource in our medico-legal work. The team is responsive, efficient, and delivers within timeframes we can rely on.
Senior Partner Medico-Legal Specialist
Standards at TMLEP
Built into every TMLEP instruction
Regardless of how you instruct TMLEP, the following standards apply across all services.
Secure data handling
All instructions and expert opinions are managed within secure, healthcare-grade systems designed for sensitive medical and medico-legal information.
Analyst oversight
Every instruction is actively supervised by a TMLEP analyst to ensure progress, clarity, and consistency from instruction through to delivery.
Expert governance
Experts are carefully selected, trained, and supervised under strict quality, performance, and governance criteria.
Independence
Dedicated teams, internal firewalls, and rigorous conflict-checking processes ensure expert opinion is delivered objectively and without influence.
Evidential integrity
All outputs are quality assured to ensure expert opinion is clear, consistent, and evidentially robust.
Confidentiality control
Expert evidence is provided on a confidential or disclosable basis, depending on the requirements of the matter.